Sunday, November 18, 2012

Hope Then, Action Now


In the years 2008 and 2012, America voted two different politicians into the Presidential office to fit the fiscal, social, war-time and emotional needs of the nation. Despite the drastic differences between these election years, both of these politicians voted into office are named Barack Hussein Obama.
In party affiliation, speech style and DNA, Barack Obama is the same politician in 2012 that he was in 2008. But the similarities stop there. One only needs to look at his two different victory speeches to see that Barack Obama is a very different man and will most likely be a very different president than the man elected in 2008.
Think back to 2008. You will remember a very different America. In December of 2007, America experienced the beginnings of an economic downturn comparable to the Great Depression. Sound extreme? It sounds this way for good reason. The real estate market crashed, banks crashed, the job market crashed. Barack Obama and John McCain had the privilege of running for presidency amidst a panicking and fearful America.
What did John McCain run on? The importance of dealing with the problems of our nation first before we can even dream of helping other nations. He came before America as a veteran from Arizona- conservative guns blazing. What did Barack Obama run on? Hope. Plain and simple. He came before America bright-eyed, bushy-tailed with one term as senator under his belt.
Experience is not what America needed in 2008. In 2008, America needed someone who represented newness; a coming up from the ashes. America wanted to be able to say “We are still the greatest nation on the planet.” So America chose “hope” and “progress”- exactly what Barack Obama was promising.
Everything Obama stood for and everything America needed is evident in Obama’s 2008 victory speech. In this speech, Obama paints a picture of a new America. In order to achieve this America, Obama reminds the audience of his excitement to reach across the aisle- figuratively and literally- to get things done (9 minutes in). He then talks about the need for Americans to be willing to help each other (9:50). Obama states that it is time to get rid of the partisanship that has held back American progress (10:10). After aligning himself with Lincoln (11:00), Obama declares that “a new dawn of American leadership is at hand” (11:30). America’s newly elected President wraps up his speech with the statement that the true genius of America is her ability to change (12:30).
The speech oozes of hope. The President Elect’s optimism for the nation is not to be brushed off or taken lightly; as naive or perhaps unrealistic as Obama’s speech, goals and intentions for the nation may seem now, this is exactly what the nation wanted and desperately needed at the time.
Fast-forward four years and the political race for the presidency looks completely different. Instead of the staunchly conservative veteran from Arizona, the Republican Party chose a younger, more moderate Governor from Massachusetts. Instead of the young, hopeful activist from Chicago, the Democratic Party chose to send in a much more experienced, more liberal candidate than before. Here’s the punchline: the Democratic candidate of 2012 was the same man as in 2008. Technically.
America in 2008 was very different from America in 2012. America in 2012 is coming out of the economic crisis of 2007. Students are not expected to drop out of college if they cannot afford it. People who have lived in this country their whole lives but are not citizens are being given the opportunity to be considered legitimate and contribute to society. Health care is considered a right, not a privilege.
So why is Obama still the man for the job? He has grown with the nation. The man who gave the presidential victory speech of 2012 is a very different man from the one in 2008. Instead of emphasizing the ability to reach across the aisle, this man discussed the need to move forward no matter what. Instead of encouraging politicians to put aside their party affiliations to work together, he celebrated the ability of our nation to argue and disagree- after all, this is democracy. Instead of championing the new type of leadership entering America, he embodied it.
When considering the nation’s growth and Obama’s transformation, his politics play a role but not nearly as significant as one would think. What is so astounding about Barack Obama is that, while he has had to become a new man, he has been the man America has wanted and needed for the past two elections. One may say that this isn’t new or significant- a great majority of Presidents have received their opportunity at their second term. While this may be true, three things cannot be ignored:
1) America in 2012 looks very different from America of 2008
2) President Elect Obama in 2012 looks very different from President Elect Obama in 2008
3) Both Obamas have been exactly what the nation called upon at the time

Saturday, November 10, 2012

My Right, My Duty, My Privilege

     In my last post, I put up a video called "The Ballot or the Bullet" and mentioned that I was excited to vote because I can. I want to expand on that.
     In one of his most famous speeches, Malcolm X explores the state of the nation and what he believes is necessary for the Black community to do in order to move forward. If you haven't heard it, listen to it. I don't care what race or political ideology you prescribe to- every American needs to be aware of the discussion posed by Malcolm X. Too many people are familiar with what they believe was the mentality of Dr. King. When Dr. King is discussed, he is discussed within the parameters of non-violence. While non-violence was a necessary aspect of Dr. King's message, there was a much deeper struggle being addressed that is too often ignored. Think about it: if Dr. King had a non-violent perspective, there had to be an opposing perspective. Most Americans are aware of the fact that Malcolm X was the "other." However, most believe that Malcolm X prescribed to a violent ideology. This is not true. As the title of the speech suggests, Malcolm X had a number of issues he wanted to be able to address through voting; however, if his vote was not heard, Malcolm X recognized that a gun would be a bit louder. Interestingly enough, many of the problems Malcolm X addresses in 1964 are very much still problems today.
     The existence of these issues is one of many reasons I feel it is so important to vote. If I do not treat an issue as important, how can I ever expect my representation to see it as important? I can't. My responsibility to my community and the world around me is what makes voting a duty.
     My ability to vote is what makes me excited. As an African American, I did not have the right to vote until 1870. As a woman, I did not have the right to vote until 1920. As easy it is to be angry about the years of discrimination anyone who has looked like me has endured for centuries, the fact remains: I CAN VOTE. A lot of change has had to happen in this country but change is constantly occurring. I am proud of the progress of my nation and would be doing myself and many others a disservice if I did not exercise my civic right, duty and privilege to vote. 

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Because I CAN

A moment of truth: I got to vote today. Despite the snarkiness of last post on the Electoral College (I mean, let's face it, who DOESN'T get upset when talking about the Electoral College?), I am STOKED about today. Why? I am so glad you asked.
There used to be a time when someone who looked like me was not allowed to vote. No matter how broken the system may be, I put on my red, white and blue and I voted today. You want to know why? BECAUSE I CAN. And that, my friends, is a beautiful thing.

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Why Vote? It's Already been Done for You

     The college campus, much like the greater United States, brings people with any number of differences together to achieve the same goal: education. This collision of differences can be seen within the friendship of my roommate and me. She is a democrat from Maryland; I am an independent from California. She is studying Chinese, Film and History; I am studying Spanish and Political Science. For all of the differences that exist between the two of us, we do have one thing in common: neither of our votes will count this Tuesday.
     And why won't they count? Despite the numerous logistical issues that exist that would prohibit our votes from counting (Florida's butterfly ballot of 2000 for example), one institutional block on voting still exists: the Electoral College.
     Don't know what the Electoral College is? You're not alone. I had to look it up too. The Electoral College is an archaic and outdated institution. The College was established by America's Founding Fathers as a bridge between tyranny of the majority and decisions being made for the people by Congress.
     In theory, the College sounds really nice. The problem is, it has the ability to (and has... four times to be exact) choose a president counter the popular vote of the American people. Remember the election of 2000? Remember Al Gore? Yeah, he actually won the popular vote. So why was Bush president for the next 8 years? That was all thanks to the Electoral College (and an excellent assist by the Supreme Court).
     According to the archives, each state chooses their electors. How? Apparently that's up to each state too. And with this fact, we find another flaw of the Electoral College: even though the College is making crucial decisions concerning the election, there is no way to keep them accountable... no one knows who they are!
     So now that we know what is logistically wrong with the Electoral College, let's talk implications. When you and I go to vote, we will not be voting for a president. Did you know that? We will actually be voting for a group of representatives (the Electoral College) whose job it is to report our vote. Because the Electoral College is meant to summarize, if you will, the votes of each state, each vote does not count as one vote. Instead, each vote becomes a part of the will of the state as a whole. For example, being a Republican in California will never make any difference in the presidential election because the population of Democrats will always outnumber the population of Republicans. Ever wonder why presidential candidates don't spend too much time trying to persuade California? It is a captured state. No matter how many loyal Republicans exist in the suburbs of California, there will always be more Democrats in the larger cities, which brings us to the next flaw of the Electoral College.
     Thanks to the Electoral College, swing states will always matter more than captured ones. For some reason, there are a few states (such as the notorious Ohio and Florida) that can't seem to get their act together. These swing states have not developed a pattern for voting for one party. They do what they want. Remember, the Electoral College does not count the vote of each individual as a separate vote, but rather finds out what the majority of that state wants and is supposed to vote that way. This is why swing states become so important: members of swing states tend to remain undecided much longer or these states vote a certain way by a small margin. These few undecided states end up deciding the entire election.
     Let's review, shall we? My roommate's and my votes will not matter on Tuesday. Why? 1) The Electoral College groups our individual votes into one vote for the whole state. 2) We are both members of captured states. In order for the voice of the rest of America (not just the swing states) to matter, we have got to get rid of the Electoral College. Otherwise, this young, naive, excited voter will have no choice but to be apathetic with the rest of the nation. And why wouldn't she? Her vote doesn't count anyways.

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Keeping my Mouth Shut

     Earlier in the week, a friend informed me that she will not be voting. While I was not surprised, I asked her why. Her response was that she does not know who she should vote for or what she should base her vote on. She then asked what I thought: Should someone who doesn't know who they want to vote for vote anyways? My answer to her was straightforward: The person should know and then they should vote. While I was speaking with this friend, I understood what she was saying. Why would a person spend so much time concerning herself with politics when there are other things to do (such as get lost in a marathon of television)? Still, I had no sympathy for her lack of knowledge. Since then, my own confidence in voting has been shaken.
     I hate the two party system. The problem I have with the two party system is that I feel limited. Personally, I agree with the social policies of one party and the fiscal policies of another. So what does this mean? It means I have to choose. What means more to me, my morals or belief of what will get our nation back on track fiscally? Up until today, I was quite certain that fiscal issues mean more to me. As my other posts can attest, I care deeply about education. Forgetting all of my personal bias- both of my parents have worked in and made their living in the education field and I am a college student- I genuinely believe that education is consistently one of the most important issues on the ballot. Education is one of the few issues that can be pointed to as having an immediate, lasting and irreversible impact on the future of our nation at all times. This is one of the main reasons I have chosen to focus on fiscal issues.
     Personally, I also find fiscal issues to be the least controversial. While they are extremely important, people are less likely to be insulted by discussions on fiscal issues. Altogether, fiscal issues are less emotionally charged and look to find practical solutions. Social issues on the other hand, are emotionally charged. Even a discussion on certain issues can greatly offend individuals on either side. Call me a pansy, but I prefer not to deal with emotions when discussing politics.
     Maybe in doing this, I have chosen the easy way out. Instead of standing up for what I believe in, I have chosen to deal with issues that are important and are less controversial. Perhaps my friend was the more correct of the two of us: maybe it would be better if I did not vote. Of course I will vote but the discussion with my friend forced me to think about things I have never thought about before. Is it acceptable that I am choosing to ignore a set of issues for my own comfort and the comfort of those around me? I think not.

Friday, October 19, 2012

Voting 101

     Recently, SNL released a skit entitled the "Undecided Voter." Just as the name implies, this video acknowledges the importance of the undecided voter and address the issues undecided voters have to deal with. Instead of talking about typical political issues, the skit argues that the biggest problems the undecided voter deals with is not knowing the basics of how to vote.
     As ridiculous as the video seems, it is surprisingly accurate. As a student at USC, I have quite a few friends who have not registered to vote... Monday is the last day to register. While many of these people have the best of intentions of voting, they most likely not be able to as a result of not fulfilling the requirements.
     There are two things to note about the statement made above. First, the college age bracket is notorious for not voting. Before entering college, I could not perceive how someone who had the ability to vote would choose not to. Now that I am a part of the highly scrutinized age bracket, I understand: we don't know what we're doing. Do we have to apply for a change of address every time we move apartments (all within a mile radius of each other, mind you)? Should we just use our parents' address? Is it better to vote in the state you are currently in (and may be starting a life in) or in the state where your life has been (but may be no longer)? Secondly, the young people I am referring to GO TO USC. As can be seen in "Going Green" by Peter Raptis and "Poverty & Education in the United States: The Cyclical Disaster" on That's Annoying, people of my generation do indeed care about today's issues. If a group of highly educated individuals do not know how or do not feel comfortable with the voting process, how can the general population be expected to?
     I wonder if it is time to revise the voting system. For a generation that spends more time with a computer than a pen and paper, the bureaucratic system currently in place makes no sense. I am not arguing that the whole system should be converted to an online system- people would still be left out of the voting process in that case. Rather, I am arguing that the voting system should be revised and expanded. I am curious to see if voting rates would increase if voting online was made a possibility. If changing the voting system to be something that makes sense to all possible voters is "out of the question," maybe the government can start supporting Voting  101 classes... But then again, I wonder how many people would take the class.


Sunday, October 14, 2012

Joe Biden, I Thank You

     As I stated in "The First Step," I am a political science major and I am attempting to become more politically motivated. In order to be a better political science major and citizen, I chose to watch the presidential and vice presidential debates. My expectation entering the presidential debate was to have a clearer idea of what each candidate thought is the current state of our nation and their plans for our future. Simply, I wanted to know where candidate stood on today's issues. That is not what I got. Instead of being inspired or even informed, I was bored. The debate was filled with a yelling Romney, a submissive Obama and numbers being thrown around that meant nothing to my untrained ears. In essence, I felt just as disengaged as Olivia Reed expressed in her post, "You Only Care about One Thing??!!!". Fortunately, this post does not end with the presidential debate.
     Despite the horrors of the presidential debate, I decided to keep hope alive: I watched the vice presidential debate. This time, I went in with much lower expectations- I expected a repeat of the presidential debate. I  was pleasantly surprised. The vice presidential debate was exciting and fun to watch. After the vice presidential debate, I had to ask myself: Why did I enjoy the vice presidential debate so much more than I enjoyed the presidential debate? The vice presidential debate did not provide me with more information, nor did it assist me in making a choice as to who I should vote for. However, the vice presidential debate did make me interested. I cared about was curious to see what was going to be said. Assuming I went into both debates with a fair amount of cynicism, nothing about my viewership changed. So what was so different about the two debates? I finally came to the conclusion that there was only one difference between the two debates for me: Joe Biden.
     Joe Biden was snappy, quick-witted and thoroughly prepared. I found that, even while Paul Ryan was speaking, I was watching Biden to see his next expression. While Romney and Obama only seemed to be throwing around facts and disagreeing with each other, Biden and Ryan were having a great time. There were quite a few jokes being thrown around at each other's expense. Each man was able to make his point while also taking a cheap shot or two at his opponent. While Ryan was indeed a part of this banter, he was much slower to enter this arena of the debate.
     Why did Biden feel like he had so much freedom to joke and laugh and roll his eyes while all we got from Obama was the occasional head shake? I believe that Biden is simply more secure in his political career. Biden knew that his debate was not going to win or lose the presidential election BUT his debate could help the President's current standing in the race. Joe Biden is also significantly older than any of other three participants in this presidential race. It is possible that Biden simply has an older debate style. Whatever the reason for Biden's spontaneity during the debate, I am grateful. Biden did a wonderful job of engaging voters of all stages and ages. If the man was able to inspire a blog post, he may have the potential to inspire a few voters.

Just for fun: Some funny tweets about the debate.
   

Sunday, October 7, 2012

Integrating African American Culture into the American Education System


Within the African American community, one issue is constantly discussed: education. Though there are many reasons for this, one is that African Americans have historically underperformed in school in comparison to their white counterparts. In his article, “Mr. Nigger: The Challenges of Educating Black Males within American Society,” Toby Jenkins focuses on the black male and how he is treated in the school system. While treatment of students is a legitimate concern, one may also look to the lack of representation of African Americans within the education system. In nearly every, if not every, subject in school African Americans are underrepresented and as a result, underperform and are unprepared for higher education and the greater world around them. This paper will explore how an integration of African American culture into education can greatly benefit African American students.
One of the most interesting components of the American culture is the denial of culture. Many Americans like to consider “culture” as something that is specifically foreign or limited to ethnic groups.  Many Americans “may be offended by the notion that they hold certain ideas and behave in certain ways simply because they were born and raised in the United States and not because they had consciously thought about those ideas and behaviors and chosen the ones they preferred” (Morgan 31).  Ironically, America takes on a culture of individualism. However, for this sweeping statement to be made, one must forget that America is not comprised of a single group of people; within America, there are any number of smaller groups that all have their own specific culture (mentality, history). An important aspect of developing culture is education. Interestingly enough, though America has a vast scope of people, the education system is fairly limited. Within the education system, one culture is being perpetuated and instead of pushing America to be more homogenous, the nation is remaining polarized; most minorities are not ascribing to “American culture” being taught to them and as a result, are not reaping the benefits of being an American.
            In “Marginalized curriculums: Transforming one's place in the margins,” Bryant discusses the literary canon and how this part of the English curriculum marginalizes a vast majority of students. In order to discuss how the literary canon has marginalized so many types of students, Bryant dissects a theory by Paul Lauter. This theory looks at three specific factors that Launter believe tie directly to marginalization (58). First, the professionalization of the teaching literature placed the power to select literature that was to be taught in school in the hands of a few elite. Secondly, a theory of aesthetic was developed that significantly narrowed the books that could be chosen to be placed in the canon. This theory said that great poetry-poetry worth being studied- involved tension, not simplicity or unity. This simple definition of poetry to be studied automatically eliminated many African American and female poets; these poets had a tendency to write in a style different from that sought after by the canon. Thirdly, the canon has attempted to break history up into important time periods. Because American history has been written by white men, most “significant time periods” were those that favored and focused on the white community. Although America is known as a melting pot, only a section of the population is being represented in the literary canon that all students are subject to.
Much research has been done throughout the years as to why African Americans historically perform lower in the school system. Despite all of this information and research gathered on the African American community and their performance within the school system, not much has changed; African Americans are still underperforming. While a look at the literary canon is only one example, it is a well-known fact that a lack of representation within the school system leads to marginalization. This paper will focus on one possible way to bring African Americans out of the margins and into a reality of representation within the school system. While the ideas in this paper may indeed relate to other minorities, their marginalization, and practical ways to create education for all students, this paper will focus on the African American community.
The history of African Americans has been unique to say the least. Though nearly all African Americans have a long-standing history in America through ancestors who have been in America for decades, the African American culture is distinctly different from the one known to be the typical American culture. While the American culture is defined by being individualistic, the defining characteristic of the African American community was best phrased by W. E. B. Du Bois as a “double-consciousness.” In The Souls of Black Folk, Du Bois describes double-consciousness as an acute awareness that the African American is not fully apart of the society he or she lives in. In this double-consciousness, the African American population is aware of how the surrounding community views them as lesser (45). Interestingly enough, Du Bois states that it is not the goal of the African American to change society.  African Americans do not wish to change the American system any more than they wish to be changed by the system. In essence, the African American seeks to be able to be both black and American; African Americans want to be able to maintain their identity and be fully accepted as members of society. Though Du Bois expressed these thoughts over 100 years ago, they still ring true. African Americans have still not reached equality within the nation and are still fully aware of their unique position within the nation. While the double-consciousness discussed above may not strike one as “cultural,” it is absolutely imperative to understand this group mentality in order to understand the importance of incorporating culture into the education system.
Another example of this separation between the alleged equality and reality of equality within American society for the African American community can be found in Kajikawa’s discussion of African American music. Kajikawa argues that, although America has been increasingly diversified since the 1980s, “the idea of ‘black music’ persists” (19). Kajikawa argues that no other music is nearly as racially coded as black music. She continues that when other minorities enter the music scene, they too, are forced to choose a black or white sound. Interestingly enough, Kajikawa points out that though black music is readily distinguishable, it is not excluded from the public sphere (such as retail stores). This distinction is interesting in that it harkens back to a “separate but equal” mentality. Black music is still considered as something noticeably different from American music but it is still enjoyed by mass audiences. Kajikawa attributes this to the ability to decontextualize the sound of black music from the reality of the meaning lying within the sound. While Kajikawa’s paper focuses on the distinct culture visible through black music, this look at music can be a helpful insight into how double-consciousness plays out in reality.
Though a subtle “separate but equal” attitude seems to persist in American social life, much has changed for African Americans in the area of education. One must remember that there was a time in this nation where African Americans were not educated. Many African Americans were never offered education until it was made public during Reconstruction. Unfortunately, these schools were subject to being funded by state governments who were dominated by white Americans. This led to black schools being drastically underfunded. Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) serves to reinforce this façade of “separate but equal” schools and institutions. A shift in this thought toward education for African Americans does not change until Brown v. Board of Education (1954). This case stated that separate is inherently unequal. Though the decision of this case was a landmark in and of itself, significant change was not immediate. Furthermore, equality has still not been reached in performance between African American students and their white counterparts.
Because it is no longer acceptable to categorize blacks as “the lesser race,” it is important to explore the possible reasons as to why African Americans are underperforming in school. While any number of factors can be attributed to the lesser performance of African American students, the fact remains that African American students are being marginalized. As discussed previously, white students are overrepresented in nearly every subject area of the education system, as seen through the example of the literary canon, while their black counterparts are being marginalized. Before looking into how the education system can and should be changed, an interesting topic to look at is black self-education. For indeed, blacks being marginalized within the education system is not a new concept. And yet, many African Americans have positively influenced this nation through their intellect and fresh perspective on American history.
Because African American history has traditionally been excluded from all public education settings, many renowned African American thinkers are self-educated and have passed this information down in much of the same way folklore is passed down: through word of mouth. In his paper, Dagbovie explores how some of America’s most influential African Americans from the 1960s through the 1980s were self-educated. These self-proclaimed historians include: Malcolm X, Harold Cruse, Angela Davis and Lerone Bennett, Jr. Dagbovie discusses how each of these people constitute significant historians and how each have influenced the history of this nation. Though it is not necessary to delve into the details of each of these historians, it is important to see the patterns of the self-educated historian and how this has affected the African American community and American history as a whole. As a public intellectual, Malcolm X had the brilliant capability of actively educating himself on the history of African Americans and communicating this history to his audience in a way which inspired many to actively pursue their own education and liberation (608). Though the other historians mentioned may not have had the same breadth of audience Malcolm X had, much of their self-education served the same purpose. For example, while Cruse was not an active speaker, he was able to communicate his ideas through his writing: The Crisis of the Negro Intellectual: A Critical Interpretation of African American History (613). While Angela Davis is unique in her focus on African American females tracing back to the female slave, she too chose to articulate her historical studies through formal articles (618). Lerone Bennett, Jr. is an interesting case in that he chooses to mass communicate the importance of African American history through two popular magazines: Ebony and Jet (621).
Each of the self-educated historians mentioned above had a major impact on the Black Power movement. While the benefits of this movement are debatable, the significant role these people played is not. Nor is the fact that through the work of these self-proclaimed historians and others like them the African American community was empowered to seek after education and knowledge of their own history. The work of these historians and the turmoil in which they lived also reveals three things. First, they reveal exactly how much work must be done for one to seek out their own history. Secondly, they reveal the detriment of not being educated. Thirdly, they reveal the power one holds with an accurate perspective toward history. For indeed, self-proclaimed historians of the African American community were the only members of the black community who had a grasp on history as taught in the public education system and a grasp on the history of the African American community too often omitted from the history books. These self-educated historians had a great deal of power and influence within the African American community because unlike the public school system, which was only telling less than half of the American story, these intellectuals were able to tell a holistic story as pertained to the history of African Americans. Taking the example of these self-educated men and women, one can only imagine how much more influence public schools would be able to have in communities if schools told whole truths and histories.
In 1964, the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee’s (SNCC) Bob Moses and Liz Fusco started the summer freedom school project in Mississippi (Street 273). Though Moses’ initial reason for working in Mississippi was to encourage wider voting in the state, Moses found a way to make a longer lasting impact in the state. The main premise behind freedom schools was to encourage students to “think and develop their own ideas about a free society” (274). These schools did exactly what this paper suggests would be the best possible academic route for African American students in that they  incorporated African American culture into every aspect of the academic setting. In addition to the typical subjects covered in school (math, science, English, etc.), the freedom schools also taught subjects such as political and social studies, art, film studies, dance, drama, etc. While it is obvious how African American culture can be integrated into the additional subjects taught in freedom schools, one may have difficulty comprehending how African American culture could be incorporated into subjects such as math and science. In all core classes, the material was placed in a context the students would recognize.
Reflecting the citizenship schools that emerged through the programmes of the Highlander Folk School, SNCC intended the curriculum to derive from the students’ background and planned to base classroom activities around the students’ experiences, thus ensuring that school activities remained fully grounded in Mississippian culture. As Jane Stembridge suggested to new freedom school teachers, ‘rather than discuss the concept of economic pressure as such, you talk about Capitol Street in Jackson [Mississippi] and how many of the stores have been closed down. The students will begin to understand these concepts, but as realities’ (278-279).
In this way, African American students received an education which mirrored the quality of education received by their white peers. Because these schools were so politically rooted, they were also able to remain current. In order to look at the impact and history of the Emancipation Proclamation, the September 1963 issue of Ebony was used as supplemental text by many schools (280). 
            While these schools did not become the official school system of Mississippi, they do provide substantial evidence for the encouragement of integrating culture into the public education system. First, the freedom schools provided an environment for students to learn and understand. Because the freedom schools incorporated details of everyday life for the dwellers of Mississippi, subjects such as math and science no longer seemed like foreign concepts, but rather, related directly to their lives. Secondly, the freedom schools differed from typical public schools in that they did not teach typical history classes where only white history was taught. In these summer schools, students were given the opportunity to learn African American history. Though the students who participated in freedom schools were African American, there was no way for them to be formally educated in the history of African Americans before the freedom schools. Lastly, the freedom schools were able to better prepare students for higher education. While one may argue that most of higher education is also slanted in favor of white history, students who attended freedom schools were able to receive a more holistic perspective on American history and have a better understanding of their own history as a people. In sum, the freedom schools were able to provide African Americans just as much education on their own history as typical public schools give on white history.
            Despite the invaluable experience freedom schools and the possibility of schools like them provide, there are a few possible negatives to address. One may argue that reproducing schools like the freedom schools would simply be too expensive. Indeed, it seems that completely new text books would need to be produced and distributed in order for African American history and culture to be taught. In order to see a possible solution, one need only look to the freedom schools. “… SNCC solicited charities, organizations and individuals to provide books that stressed the black contribution to American life. The Souls of Black Folk, John Hope Franklin’s From Slavery to Freedom, Carter G. Woodson’s Negro Makers of History and Langston Hughes’s A Pictorial History of the Negro People in the United States formed the core of the history curriculum” (280).  With the number of groups dedicated to the equality of the African American community within society, the mass distribution of the above works should not be a difficulty. Similarly, one may argue that no single school or district has the time or resources to completely revamp the current education system. However, a large percentage of America is being completely ignored within the school system. In order for a more perfect union to be a reality, education for all citizens must be developed. Furthermore, most schools with a majority of African American students are already drastically underfunded. Theoretically, the state could incentivize instilling more African American culturally sound education by offering districts funding in exchange for instating the program.
            While this paper has focused on the value of integrating culture into education for African Americans, the thoughts expressed here could be applied to other minorities and their lack of representation within the public school system. The reality of pockets of people living in various areas of the nation persists today. Areas in the nation exist where there is a higher percentage of Latinos than whites or African Americans. In this case, the thoughts expressed in this paper should be applied to Latinos. Furthermore, with America constantly changing to include different types of people, one may argue that students should be learning about the vast number of people groups within this nation who have been a major part in American history. While the statement above is accurate- students should be learning about a holistic America- African American students have yet to be adequately educated on their own history. In order for the education system to represent the American population, each member of American society must be educated in his or her own history first.

Works Cited
Bryant, L. A. Marginalized curriculums: Transforming one's place in the margins.  Transformations, 4(2), (1993). 58-58.
Dagbovie, Pero Gaglo. History as a Core Subject Area of African American Studies: Self-Taught             and Self-Proclaimed African American Historians, 1960s-1980s. Journal of Black Studies, Vol. 37, No. 5 (May., 2007), pp. 602-629
Du Bois, W. E. B. The Souls of Black Folk. New York: Vintage /Library of America, 1990. Print.
Jenkins, Toby S. Mr. Nigger: The Challenges of Educating Black Males within American Society. Journal of Black Studies ,Vol. 37, No. 1 (Sep., 2006), pp. 127-155
Kajikawa, L. Y. (2009). Centering the margins: Black music and american culture, 1980--2000.                 University of California, Los Angeles. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. 226.
Lauter, Paul. "Race and Gender in the Shaping of the American Literary Canon: A Case Study    from the Twenties." Feminist Studies 9.3 (1983): 435-463.
Morgan, D. (2008). American Culture, Corporate Culture, and the Transformation of Business                  Practice: The role of Social Foresight in a Restorative Economy. Foresight: The Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy, 10(4), 31-42.
Street, J. (2004). Reconstructing Education From the Bottom Up: SNCC's 1964 Mississippi Summer   Project and African American Culture. Journal of American Studies, 38(2), 273-296.

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Significance of Style

     With the 2012 Presidential election in full swing, media attention has shifted toward politicians. Included in this shift of attention is a pointed interest in the words of politicians, specifically, their speeches. In his post, "Political Pageantry," Simple Wisdom discusses what he perceives to be the relationship between political speakers, their speeches and their audiences. In short, Simple Wisdom argues that most Americans have completely missed the point of these speeches. Instead of commenting on the content of the speeches they hear, people comment on the style. He argues that this seems to be a growing trend for all of America's population; he has witnessed both uneducated and educated members of society discuss political speeches in this way. Though Simple Wisdom's interpretation of his peers' reaction to political speeches is understandable, I do not believe he has taken the very purpose of speeches into consideration. While speeches are meant to inform, they are also meant to attract and inspire.
     Obama, the focus of "Political Pageantry," is known for being a brilliant and persuasive speaker; however, is not the only American president who has been credited with mastering the auditory art. Though his presidency was cut short, JFK was able to establish himself as a captivating speaker. In an article entitled, "JFK's Inaugural Speech: Six Secrets of his Success," BBC's Max Atkinson explores exactly why JFK was such a brilliant orator. JFK gave this speech while America was enduring an extremely high-pressure time period. As a result, JFK's speech was full of generalizations of his position on the issues. However, similarly to Simple Wisdom's stance on his peers, Atkins does not address the content of JFK's speech; Atkins dissects the intricate details of JFK's speech in order to know why JFK's speech had such a profound effect on his listeners. I believe there are two reasons why professionals and laymen choose to pay more attention to the style of the speaker as opposed to the content of their speech. First, politicians are a unique breed of celebrity. Secondly, many Americans have already chosen their side of the argument before the speech even begins.
     Politicians have an interesting place in the media. Politicians are not typical celebrities- their claim to fame is not to entertain or mesmerize. Theoretically, the job of the politician is to serve as a voice for the people or to inspire voting decisions. Politicians are not newscasters or reporters- their job is not to introduce news to the American people. Because of their role as quazi-celebrities, politicians do not experience constant exposure to the lime-light. As a result, politicians are not the primary medium by which Americans receive their information on today's political issues. Because politicians are not the majority of American's primary source for political news, many Americans have already determined their stance on the issues before the speaker even opens his or her mouth.
     So if the job of the politician is not to educate, what is his or her responsibility? The main goal of the political speaker is to unite, encourage and persuade. Viewing the political speech in this way, discussing how persuasive the speech is or the speaker's style no longer seems shallow but respectable and legitimate.


Friday, September 21, 2012

Bill Clinton: The Comeback King

     Bill Clinton is one of America's most interesting presidents. There is no other president who has done so much good and endured so much controversy -- and lived to tell the tale.
     Politics aside, Clinton was a dynamic president. He entered the position with both a socially and fiscally troubled America; not only did Clinton enter office with a recession resting on his shoulders, he also had to deal with a racially charged environment. Clinton entered office to an America that was dealing with gang violence, police racism against civilians, and open hatred between races who had never before openly communicated. Essentially, Clinton was walking into a cross fire. Not too many anticipated him walking out alive.
     When Clinton's presidency was all said and done, racial tensions had been squashed and America had a fiscal surplus. Clinton did such a good job relating to all of his constituencies that the black community dubbed him the first "black" president. However, the good Clinton did is not all that he is remembered for. Though he was a wonderful president, Clinton was a terrible husband. We all remember the scandal. However, after dealing with a scandal like Clinton's, most presidents would likely choose to keep silent until their dying days. Clinton, on the other hand, has managed to put the scandal behind him, give America enough time to forgive him, and has now resurfaced. Not only is Clinton still a part of the political scene, he is at the forefront.
     Clinton had the honor of announcing the Democratic party's Presidential candidate, President Barack Obama, at the Democratic National Convention. One would think that with Clinton's track record, the Democrats would want to keep Clinton as far away from the DNC as possible. Not so! And for good reason: Clinton did more for Obama than the party could have ever imagined. Not only did Clinton lay out exactly what Obama has done the past four years, he did it in his natural, care-free, back-woods way. With one, 45 minute-long charming speech, Clinton has, once again, won over the nation.

Friday, September 14, 2012

Bill Cosby's Rise to Public Intellectual

           Bill Cosby is one of America’s favorite and most well-known family men. Stand-Up comedy, Fat Albert, The Cosby Show, Kids Say the Darndest things – Cosby has done it all. A human experience that he cannot identify with and make comical does not seem to exist. Ultimately, Cosby becomes much more than a comedian and encompasses all roles a man can assume in his life: a father, husband, friend, and mentor. Over the past forty years, America has had the pleasure of growing up or growing old with Cosby.  As of late, though, Cosby has added one more title to his repertoire: advocate.  In recent years, Cosby has made it clear that he is not only America’s funny man; he also cares deeply about education and the advancement of the black community. Though few could predict a shift in his role as a comedian and all-American family man, Cosby has transformed into a public intellectual.
            As defined in the blog post “The ‘Decline’of Public Intellectuals?” by Steven Mack, a public intellectual is a social critic who has accumulated an audience. This audience may have been accumulated though classroom, stage, or other means. Once the public intellectual has an audience, the individual must have ideas to convey. Ideally, the public intellectual would not have anything prohibiting his or her speech, such as a position in a governmental office. Though those holding a government position or a different type of office may seem like perfect candidates for consideration as public intellectuals, they often have imposed agendas – whether covert or overt – that they must abide by.  However, the public intellectual is at his or her best when uninhibited and therefore able to speak freely about what he or she finds necessary for an improved society.
            Going by the standards of the definition provided above, one less familiar with Cosby’s most recent works may wonder how he qualifies as a public intellectual. To understand this, one must also understand the chain of events in Cosby’s life that led to his rise in notoriety.  Coming from humble beginnings, life began to pick up for Cosby when he joined the navy, where he ran track. As a result of running track, Cosby received a scholarship to Temple University. While attending Temple, Cosby worked as a bartender at a coffee house, and telling jokes at the coffee house eventually led to performances in New York. In his earliest performances, inspired by comedian Dick Gregory, Cosby gave his audience a taste of his thoughts on race. However, Cosby eventually decides to stick with topics he believes are more universal, such as family and dating. With his appearance on The Tonight Show in 1963, Cosby began to accumulate a broader audience, and the rest is history.
            Outside of comedy, Cosby has had extensive experience within the education system. In 1976, Cosby earned a doctorate in education from the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Cosby’s doctoral thesis was entitled "An Integration of the Visual Media via Fat Albert and the Cosby Kids into the Elementary School Curriculum as a Teaching Aid and Vehicle to Achieve Increased Learning."   Just as the name implies, Cosby’s thesis explores the worlds of education and entertainment, two worlds in which he had experience and success in. In his dissertation, Cosby addressed two fundamental issues: the need to eliminate institutional racism and the need to develop a curriculum that will best help elementary school students reach their full potential.
Although Cosby qualifies as a public intellectual through the combination of his broad audience and his concern for America’s education system, he has endured much criticism of his intellect. One of the primary reasons for this criticism lies with a speech Cosby gave at the NAACP’s celebration of Brown v. Board of Education’s 50th anniversary.  This 2004 speech has gone down in infamy as the “Pound Cake” speech, a result of Cosby discussing a young African American male who stole a pound cake and was shot in the head by a police officer as a result of the crime. After mentioning a tragedy like the one above, the speaker’s typical and expected response is outrage with the officer and the system as a whole. Cosby, on the other hand, took a drastically different stance. In the speech, he questions why the young man stole the pound cake in the first place. This question wasn’t asked out of sympathy for the young man, but instead out of anger that this man stole in the first place. The entire speech continues in this vein, forcing Cosby’s listeners out of any congratulatory mood they had been in and slapping them in the face with what Cosby perceives to be the reality of the black community.
One of the aspects that makes Cosby’s speech so interesting is that much of what he said would be perceived as racist if it flowed from white lips. In fact, a major critique Cosby received after the speech was that he had forgotten where he came from and how systematically difficult life is for young black men, especially. Instead of taking Cosby seriously, many discounted Cosby’s speech because of his age. The speech was perceived as the ramblings of an old man as opposed to a well thought-out critique on society. Many of those who did take Cosby seriously called his speech inappropriate and insensitive. Cosby was asked to speak in honor of Brown v. Board of Education and instead of congratulating America on our progress as a nation, he chose to single out the black community and blame them for their current plight. One may easily see how Cosby’s speech could be interpreted as off balance, inappropriate, or just plain wrong.
            If one were to hear or read Cosby’s speech without its conclusion, one could very easily write the speech off as an angry rant or the speech of a man past his prime. However, Cosby ends his speech with the following:
So, ladies and gentlemen, I want to thank you for the award (big laughter) and giving me an opportunity to speak because, I mean, this is the future, and all of these people who lined up and done. They've got to be wondering what the hell happened. Brown V. Board of Education, these people who marched and were hit in the face with rocks and punched in the face to get an education and we got these knuckleheads walking around who don't want to learn English (clapping) I know that you all know it. I just want to get you as angry that you ought to be. …
By stating that his goal is to anger his audience, Bill Cosby does two things: He demands that his speech be looked at analytically and tells his audience that he does indeed know what he is talking about.
            Cosby’s statement of his attempt to anger his audience frames his entire speech. His claim that black youth are lazy and are not taking the proper course of action in order to make the most of the opportunity given them through Brown v. Board of Education no longer seems racist. Furthermore, Cosby’s claims that parents need to be a more active part of their children’s education no longer rings as judgmental or harsh. If one assumes that Cosby is in his right mind and means exactly what he says, then his social commentary now carries weight. His speech no longer presents itself as a rant against the African American community, but instead transforms into a plea from one of its trusted members to do better.
One must also remember the context in which Cosby is giving this speech: Brown v. Board of Education’s 50th Anniversary.  This context and the speech’s conclusion show why Cosby is enraged. Brown v. Board of Education was a defining moment in America’s social and racial history. This court case determined that “separate but equal” within the school system was a thing of the past and would no longer be tolerated. Through this case, the Supreme Court determined that separate was inherently unequal and equality within a society needed to begin in the education process. Fifty years later, Bill Cosby tells the NAACP, the black community, and America as a whole that the current state of the black community and the performance of young African Americans in school do not reflect the work and progress which went into creating the Brown v. Board of Education ruling.
            Though Cosby’s speech is provocative, it does exactly what its author intended: The speech forced the audience out a state of complacency and into action. According to Mack’s standard of the function of a public intellectual, Cosby did exactly what a public intellectual is meant to.
…Trained to it or not, all participants in self-government are duty-bound to prod, poke, and pester the powerful institutions that would shape their lives. And so if public intellectuals have any role to play in a democracy—and they do—it’s simply to keep the pot boiling. The measure of public intellectual work is not whether the people are listening, but whether they’re hearing things worth talking about.
While Cosby’s speech on Brown v. Board of Education has been his most controversial piece of work, Cosby has steadily continued his work towards bettering the black community and encouraging equality of education. Though his social commentary may never be appreciated, he has done to job of a public intellectual: he has given people something worth hearing and worth talking about.
            For decades, Bill Cosby has captivated and entertained America with his humor, capturing a large audience by discussing his life and its funny moments. As Cosby made the transition from mere comedian to public intellectual, discussing the importance of education and the current state of the Black community, his faithful audience continued to listen. Though many members of the audience have not been pleased with what Cosby has had to say, he has been successful at stimulating discussion and “stirring the pot.” As he continues his rise as a public intellectual, there is no way to tell what value his words will have on the future of America and the communities he is discussing today. If his influence continues to grow, the speaker at the 100th anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education the speaker might even say, “Bill Cosby was right. And look how far we have come because we listened.”

Endnotes

Cosby,William Henry,,Jr. (1976). An integration of the visual media via "fat albert and the cosby kids" into the elementary school curriculum as a teaching aid and vehicle to achieve increased learning. University of Massachusetts Amherst). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, , 267 p. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/302825147?accountid=14749. (302825147).

Cosby, Bill, and Alvin F. Poussaint. Come On People: On the Path from Victims to Victors. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 2007. Print.

Mack, Stephen. "The "Decline" of Public Intellectuals?" The New Democratic Review. Stephen Mack, 14 Aug. 2007. Web. Sept. 2012. <http://www.stephenmack.com/blog/archives/2007/08/index.html>.

"Bill Cosby Biography." Bio.com. A&E Networks Television, n.d. Web. 14 Sept. 2012. <http://www.biography.com/people/bill-cosby-9258468>.

"Dr. Bill Cosby Speaks." Bill Cosby Speech Transcript. Eight Cities Media and Publication, n.d. Web. Sept. 2012. <http://www.eightcitiesmap.com/transcript_bc.htm>.


Wednesday, August 29, 2012

The First Step

I am quite possibly the worst Political Science major I know. I say this for several reasons: I do not read any newspaper regularly, I do not keep up with the nation's newest scandals, I have chosen to pursue very little knowledge on the world around me. So why am I a Political Science major? I am fascinated by America's system of government. I love comparing what our system is supposed to look like with what it has evolved into. However, I believe that an active knowledge of today's political scene is absolutely imperative in order to make educated voting decisions.
I am therefore going to consider this blog a social experiment. The main point of this blog will be to force myself out of my complacency towards politics and into a position of not only being politically educated, but also able to intelligently communicate my thoughts on today's political happenings. I hope to go from a political "church house mouse" to an active member in today's discussion of political and social  events that will eventually shape our nation's future. Wish me luck!